Minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The success of operative treatment depends on a quick recovery of limb function. Every injury to a muscle or its attachment is associated with decreased muscle strength and disturbed proprioception, which impedes functional recovery. Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) is defined as a surgical technique performed through a short skin incision to avoid injury to muscles and tendons. The advantages of MIS over the classic technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty include: faster recovery, shorter rehabilitation and hospital stay, decreased blood loss, less pain and a shorter scar. The anterior approach to the hip, first described by Robert Judet in 1947 as a modified Smith-Petersen approach, follows the principles of MIS. Other approaches advertised as minimally invasive (posterior, lateral, or double incision approach) are associated with muscle and/or tendon injury. Therefore, they should be referred to as Less Invasive Surgery (LIS). Complications of THA performed with the MIS technique occur most often in women with osteoporosis, above 65 years of age, or with a BMI of more than 32. The rate of complications doubles with surgeons performing less than 50 THAs per year. A special set of instruments facilitates implantation of the endoprosthesis and reduces the number of complications. The anterior approach allows for implantation of an endoprosthesis without damage to muscles and their insertions, reduces tissue damage and, more importantly, decreases the intensity of postoperative pain. Should complications occur, the anterior approach has the advantage of allowing simple access to the proximal femur by extending the approach distally, as in the Smith-Petersen technique. However, the technical challenges of MIS and the risk of complications warrant caution.
منابع مشابه
Little Clinical Advantage of Muscle Sparing over Partial Resection of Gluteus Muscles in Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Total
Introduction Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become common, and several approaches are now used clinically. We have been using an anterolateral (AL) approach with partial resection of the gluteus medius in minimally invasive THA. Recently, faster recovery has been reported using the AL approach with muscle sparing technique (modified Watson-Jones approach) [1]. Our concern i...
متن کاملCost effectiveness of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty
CRD summary The objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of two minimally invasive techniques for total hip arthroplasty, which were the mini-incision technique and the Minimally Invasive Solutions two-incision hip procedure. These were compared with conventional surgery. The authors concluded that the minimally invasive techniques were more effective and less expensive than the conventi...
متن کاملBlood Loss in the Minimally Invasive Posterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study
AIMS Our primary aim was to evaluate whether there is really less bleeding in patients for whom the minimally invasive posterior approach is used in comparison with the direct lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty. Our secondary aim was to evaluate the clinical functional results after six months as well as the postoperative radiographic result. METHODS In a comparative non-rand...
متن کاملTotal hip arthroplasty using a posterior minimally invasive approach – results after six years☆
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the medium-term clinical-functional results (minimum follow-up of six years) from total uncemented hip arthroplasty performed by means of a posterior minimally invasive access, in comparison with the traditional right lateral access. METHODS In a comparative prospective study, 224 adult patients underwent elective total hip arthroplasty due to a diagnosis of primary or s...
متن کامل[Minimally invasive posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Prospective randomised trial].
BACKGROUND Our working hypothesis was that minimally invasive surgery was superior to conventional surgery for total hip arthroplasty procedure. We compared THR results in the minimally invasive posterior approach with THR results in the conventional posterior approach. METHODS Prospective, randomised trial. Fifty patients were selected and then divided into two groups based on treatment (min...
متن کاملComparison of a minimally invasive posterior approach and the standard posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty A prospective and comparative study
BACKGROUND It is not clear whether total hip arthroplasty performed via a minimally invasive approach leads to less muscle trauma compared to the standard approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS To investigate whether a minimally invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty results in lower levels of muscle-derived enzymes and better post-operative clinical results than those obtained with ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja
دوره 9 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007